hey, guys…you have new pics on Flickr…

Hey all,

    Good news… there is a new place you can upload your pictures… we have new account on Flickr…. and i’ve loaded some pictures from Yen, Peter, Navendu, Nayana, Wukai, Jer pin and Mo’s pics there… so feel free to look at and down load them….

Please upload your pics and share your joy with us…

This is the link: http://www.flickr.com

username: AFEC_X2009@yahoo.com

Password: 20090801

When you scan the Flikr don’t forget to share your every changing with us… and the pictures from our lovely course…

 

Nana

Comments (4)

After you guys left

Hi all,

When you’re reading the post you should be in your country and your home, I miss you guys so much…

Bhakta with me now,heheeee, and we fixed his visa today, then he can leave China finally……

Yen, hope you were doing great with your exam this morning…good luck…I love you…

Kai, hope everything is going well with your experiments in next month…

Navendu, you owe me 6 pineapples or 2 icecreams, so if I go to India…heeheee, you have to find a good dance teacher for me…

Nayana, you said you will send your friend here next year… remember what I said…

Dodo, I will mail you coat to you, which means I have to but not because I don’t like it… good luck with GRE…

Peter, see you next year, I’m waiting you here…

I am not used to crying, but I really miss you guys…

-Nana

Comments (3)

can you upload your funny pictures to our Picasa

Hey all,

I have an idea, and I did, heheeee….

I applied a internet photo album—that is Picasa…huhu…please upload your good and funny pictures (actually, if they’re not soooo good for you but nice for others is ok, I think…)…

I believe this course is a very good memory for most all(Caz i am not 100% sure, you all are happy in China and Banna…) but for me, i feel so lucky to know everyone of you guys…so please upload your pics to our Picasa…

Our email address afec.x2009@gmail.com and password ”20090801″ (it means Aug  1st in 2009)— if you already a gmail user go  to Picasa directly…

Alternatively, you can log in our Picasa “http://picasaweb.google.com/home?tab=mq” don’t forget the password is “20090801″

Sharing your happiness with everyone in the course (please don’t worry you are not a good photographer, and what we want is the capture of happiness), and really appreciate what you’re going to do—upload your pics…

Have fun!!

Nana

Comments (2)

Community Phylogenetic Diversity and Species Coexistence

Title: Community Phylogenetic Diversity and Species Coexistence

 

I am not a biological people (but ecological) going to give myself a challenge so I choose the totally new topic (for me)— phylogenetics just because it’s so cool and so first-cutting for me.

 

Human has been studying their environment for a long time, for the community, which might know the structure and then the function first, that means we already have ideas about what it looks like and how it works from large scale based on human’s own vision (because we don’t know how it is from other species’ vision). However, we get more powerful technique ( finds? Theory? ) today that is phylogenetics, it provides another eyes to human to look the actual dynamics of the world (I just got the idea from Matt’s lecture yesterday).  In biology, people use molecular traits or morphological data matrics to study evolution of speciation, population and community—phylogenetics. And then the tree of life was made based on phylogenic evident of species (or population, community), the all kind of trees tell us the one information that is how diversification of species (population, community) on the earth look like in the past and present, and how these living things are interacting with time.

 

How the diversity in tropical forest look like? And what are the mechanisms of species coexistence? We’ve been discussed a lot in our last student roundtable… and everyone of you have very good explaining, but today I am going to say something more about mine. There is another interesting new discipline called multiagent modeling who these are doing the research think the world is bottom-up, that means every tiny substantial interaction make the complexity, e.g. every man cut down the tree then it’s will be a big loss if there are 1000 people go to cut down treeS, which shows any accumulation from the individuals’ behavior and interaction can make a completely complex world. I was wondering if we go down to the small scale, molecular level, to look for what is the dynamics of large scale world, e.g. species coexistence… that would be very cool (that what is phylogenetics telling us), maybe human and any species on the earth just puppets of the molecular world, which means what we did just follow the orders of molecular of ourselves… this is totally a bottom-up world?

 

Then we can explain how the world should look like? Why these species coexistence why not others from phylogenetics? Sure, every scientific question is not easy to get answer and phylogenetics also is not an exception (and I am not it can answer all of questions too, because human ourselves has such short life span and limited technique as far.). And some wide men did the kind of works; they use phylogenetic methods to test how species coexistence—phylodiversity dependent seeding mortality and size structure, which we discussed” the Janzen- Connell effect” host-specific pests reduce recruitment near reproductive adults. 2006, Webb et al. use phylogenetic relationship among organisms—can move beyond ranks such as family and genus—to use phylogenetic distance among the taxa to get the conclusions that a seedling survives increases if surrounding plants are not closely related to it in a small scale.

 

And we know the interaction between plants and animals on pollinators and seed dispersers mould earth’s biodiversity (from large scale, that what I mention— human’s vision).2007, Rezenda et al. use phylogenetic method to simulate coexitinctions, which was finding a answer for understanding of structure and fate of species-rich communities, because these kind of interaction are partially dependent on past evolutionary history, and cannot be exclusively explained by current ecological processes. 2004, Cavender-Bares use phylogenetic idea to test competitive exclusion of oak communities in North Central Florida, and found environmental filtering in oak communities does not lead to clustering of closely related species, which means co-occuring oak species are more phylogenetic distantly related than oaks which are phylogenetic overdispersion.

 

As far, people have already used lots of phylogenetic method to test the relationships in the large scale world, but how about the smaller scale? How the interaction between pathogen-host (is a biological agent that causes disease or illness to its host) on plant? Most of researches of pathogens were record but only on high economically value plant, 2007Gilbert used phylogenetic distance get the result that spread rate of disease on pathogen-host depend strongly on the phylogenetic structure of the community. And current regulatory approaches strongly underestimate the local risks of global movement of plant pathogens or their hosts.

 

From now on, phylogenetic approaches may provide more and more powerful evidence for supporting what we know about the large scale world from the phylogenetic network, through visualizing evolutionary relationships between sequences, genes, chromosomes, genomes, species, population, community…  human’s curiosity has never stopped, so this may lead our to use totally new and powerful approaches to detect the world. Then maybe we can find out all of secrete of nature one day, e.g. how is the species coexistence in tropical forest…

 

Reference:

 

S.Joseph Wright (2002)Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence.Oecologia 130:1-14;

 

J.Cavender-Bares, D.D.acherly, D.A.Baum, F.A.Bazzaz (2004) Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian Oak Communities.The American Naturalist163: 823-843;

 

J. Cavender-Bares, A.Keen, B.Miles (2006)Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. Ecology87(7):S109-S122;

 

E.L.Rezende, J.E.Lavabre,P.R.Guimaraes Jr, P.Jardano, J.Bascompte(2007)Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks.Nature448:925-929;

 

C.O.Webb, G.S.Gilbert, M.J.Donoghue(2006)Phylodiversity-dependent seedling mortality, size structure, and disease in a Baonean rain forest. Ecology87(7):S123-S131;

 

Phylogenetics, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phylogenetics

Pathogen, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathogen

Phylogenetic network, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phylogenetic_network

Comments off

our independent project started already….yeah…

seems like everything is going well now, and I’m excited to look everyone start to collect your own data… that’s really interesting and exciting part for this course…

we also started to learn the spider diversity this morning with Dr.Miller… he is really patient… although I couldn’t stop asking stupid questions, haha…

Thank you Dr. Miller…

And hope you guys have fun with your projects…

Comments off

Haha…Zhuangfang’s new philosophy..

Tonight, we had a student roundtable (in the sixth day of the course), and what we discussed is — plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence.

I think everyone might have their own idea about the species coexistence and tropical biodiversity, because I had my own idea too. Unfortunately, I couldn’t explain my view quite well…

Anyway, what in my mind is?

Maybe everything starts by random… the all elements of the world are distributed randomly… however, the randomness overlaps the randomness, then we’ve had something looks not random—kind of they are regular or in a specific pattern in large scale—but when you focus on the smaller scale, seems like everything is random again, but they are interaction again and are regulation again… the whole process is top-down…

And the kinda randomness (overlaps randomness) makes the complexity world…

But only one is not random at the very beginning which is energy… that means when we are in the process of interaction (maybe the interaction is evolution, evolution between creation and another creation, or evolution between creation and their environments)…the interaction of individuals of all the creations(including the environment) restrains each other… because all of the interaction is constructed by the energy… if the energy is limited for the all of creations’ survive then we have too had something looks like regulation from outside…

Yeah, that can explain what Ferry mentioned in his Biodiversity lecture, the more energy input the more biodiversity is. That because everything just need limited energy (but they are different among every individual), and if we have constant energy input that means we’re going to have amount of creations number…

Who knows, maybe we’re going to have our own model that calculates the process of our planet… but the programs is written by * and also run by *, haha…

Ahhh.ohhh… what’re the elements? I don’t know…

Haha, so many crazy ideas….what’s the crazy Nana is…

Ok, never mind…

Comments (2)

Hey, Everyone…

Hope you guys have a good time in XTBG, and I’ve love to be your guide today… although I’ve not been doing my best job… but I already learnt a lot from you!

 

Zhuangfang has already left the normal students’ routine for a long time, so that makes her really missing the campus, and the excellent professors and you guys make Zhuangfang’s dream comes true, so ZF does be exited about the course’s schedule and really appreciate all of you…

 

Good night!

 

Zhuangfang (Nana)

Comments (4)